[Published at Global Rsearch, OpEdNews and link posted to WhatReallyHappened]
Joe Giambrone | May 11, 2014
What happened on May 2nd of this year in Odessa, Ukraine, was a complex event that has been glossed over by most news sources. The US corporate coverage has been criminal in its demonization of anti-Maidan/anti-coup activists. The propaganda narrative has even attempted to blame the victims for starting the fires that allegedly killed them. This is two levels removed from reality, and perhaps even three.
Much more information is available than has been reported in America’s criminally-complicit mainstream news. But even alternative journals have failed to pursue the most damning, morally repugnant aspect to this story: who started the violence, and why?
When a massacre happens the horrors of the atrocities tend to distract the public’s attention from the details of how it came to be in the first place. This is known to provocateurs, be they in Kiev, Moscow or in Langley Virginia. Langley is the home base of the Central Intelligence Agency, of course. The CIA director visited Kiev, confirmed by the White House on April 15th, and “dozens” of CIA agents are reported to be in Ukraine “advising” the unelected coup regime as I type this.
On May 2nd a series of events occurred that can be pieced together from the numerous videos and photographs. These show undercover police provocateurs dressed up as anti-Maidan/pro-Russian activists, but these are coordinated by a uniformed officer. The officer is identified, at Oriental Review, as “Odessa Interior ministry branch Colonel Dmitry Fucheji.”
Note the red tape armbands.
Confirmation and analysis is provided by Russian news anchor Pavel Pchelkin at Channel One Russia. The gunmen, allegedly from the “pro-Russian” side were undercover agents coordinated by the Ukrainian interior ministry. A platoon of approximately 30 armed undercover agents fired numerous rounds at the football crowds, who were known to be “pro unity” or “pro Ukraine” and aligned with the Maidan coup government. The undercover/gunmen started a street battle from behind police lines, hiding behind a wall of officers and instigating the football crowd to attack them.
The neo-Nazi Right Sector joined the enraged football crowd, and together they pursued these provocateurs – who were dressed similarly to “pro-Russian” protesters – pursuing them all the way back to the Union hall, where the actual non-violent anti-Maidan activists had set up camp. Once this violence had begun it was easily turned against the real anti-Maidan activists, and the police provocateurs disappeared back into the police brigades.
Further confirmation comes from a Ukrainian official, acting Prosecutor General Oleh Makhnitsky:
“This action [in Odessa] was not prepared at some internal level, it was a well-planned and coordinated action in which some authorities’ representatives have taken part.”
This is a false flag event.
Undercover provocateurs shot at the football crowds to initiate the violence.
The violence was led and drawn back toward the political targets: the anti-Maidan activists.
Mass murder followed.
The next level of reality that intrudes upon and discredits Western media reporting is the idea that the fires did the killing. This is also false. The victims inside the union hall were mostly murdered with gunshots, as well as strangled to death by the neo-Nazi Right Sector storm troopers, who also were seen inside the building waving flags and cheering.
Most of the bodies seen in photographs were burned in order to hide evidence of gunshot wounds (warning: graphic photographs). This is also not reported across the media spectrum, as if it were of no importance. If the fire is to blame, this is akin to an act of nature, rather than a series of cold-blooded murders by rampaging neo-Nazi thugs allied with our supposed good buddies in Kiev.
Western media, therefore, has become a complicit propaganda organ in spinning narratives for the US State Department and its Nazi partners in the Ukraine. It truly sickens me the depravity and gall of these psychopaths (in both nations) who, in broad daylight, support the worst of the worst, war criminals, mass murderers, racist violent lunatics. This has been true of Syria and Libya prior, and now it is true in the Ukraine.
These imperial games do not amuse the Russians, of course. Russia has an intimate history with Naziism in World War Two. More Russians died in that war than did Americans, Brits, Japanese or Germans. The US/EU empowerment of the most violent, sadistic and murderous forces in Ukraine has driven the world to a true crisis point.
Already $3.2Bn has been dumped on the neo-Nazi unelected coup government, and Obama has knowingly and deceitfully called them “duly elected.”
Since when is gaining power through Molotov cocktails, snipers and bludgeoning the police considered “duly elected?”
This neo-Nazi power seizure has been a US project for quite a while now. Obama’s neo-con strategist, Victoria Nuland, has bragged that $5Bn of US tax money has been poured into Ukraine since the fall of the Soviet Union in order to influence the political system there. Nuland was caught on tape choosing “Yats” to be the frontman for US/NATO interests.
Arseniy Yatsenuk’s own foundation website prominently lists, as William Blum noted:
NATO, the National Endowment for Democracy, the US State Department, Chatham House (Royal Institute of International Affairs in the UK), the German Marshall Fund (a think tank founded by the German government in honor of the US Marshall Plan), as well as a couple of international banks. Is any comment needed?
US meddling in the 2004 Ukrainian elections was already exposed. The US corporate usual suspects are salivating on setting up shop in their new Nazi utopia.
This latest manifestation of covert US foreign policy should shock the entire world to its core and cause them to question just about every assumption they may have had about the US. Actual voting – democracy – is demonized in Crimea and in the other eastern provinces of Ukraine, while firebomb tossing Nazi psychopaths, who gleefully rape and strangle to death pregnant women, are promised $27Bn in IMF graft and loan guarantees to help cement their power over Kiev.
That message couldn’t be clearer.





Pingback: Odessa Provocateurs: Censored News | Joe Giambrone « The Progressive Mind
Pingback: Odessa Provocateurs: Censored News | Beat the rich
So who controls so much media, so effectively? It can not be the Jews, despite the masdive over-representation of Jews, because to say so is ‘anti-Semitic,’ and, ergo, not true. So who then? The us government? Well, who controls that? Re-iterate…
The owners of the media. These are not democracies.
Pingback: Odessa Provocateurs: Censored News « Truth Is Rising
Well said, Joe Giambrone… and commenters.
Related: “The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank…sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world.”
-Quote: Prof. J. Carroll Quigley
(1910-1977) Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), mentor to Bill Clinton
Source: his book Tragedy and Hope, 1966, pg 324
“The CIA is Wall Street, and vice versa.”
Michael Ruppert
Pingback: Odessa Provocateurs: More Evidence | Political Film Blog
Pingback: Ukraine Independence Referendum Results | Political Film Blog
They say the plagiarism is the sincerest form of flattery, so you should be flattered by TAR News http://tarnews.co.za/world/odessa-provocateurs-censored-news/. That is unless you have changed your name to Atheling P Reginald Mavangira and become an African “Extreme Long-range Planner, Asymmetric Threats Contingency Planner and Geo-Political and Military Scenario fanatic”. I was just beginning to wonder why this guy was so prolific, and now I know the answer.
On another subject, I don’t know that it is wise to apply the term “false flag” to this situation. There was provocateur action, but the massacre itself was not a classic “false flag” event. If Fascists had masqueraded as leftists and massacred pro-Kiev demonstrators in order to justify brutal “anti-terrorist” action, that would qualify as “false flag” in the manner in which the term has long been used. Using it in this situation can be technically justified by the actions of provocateurs, but in practical terms it just helps turn “false flag” into a meaningless buzzphrase. In the long term the mainstream will co-opt the term as yet another “double-plus bad” and its very misuse by televised loudmouths will make it impossible to disseminate cogent critiques of actual false flag events.
Thanks for the heads- up.
I stand behind the false flag label. The agents fired numerous gunshots at civilians, dressed falsely as activists. That’s false enough in my book.
Pingback: The Odessa Massacre was a Carefully Staged Covert Intelligence Operation! « Socio-Economics History Blog
Pingback: The Truth About the Odessa Massacre | The Russophile
Link to the Odessa murder photographs corrected.
Pingback: Fascism As It Is: | Under Southern Eyes